MOBILE, Ala. (BuzzReport)— New details surrounding the City of Mobile’s $14.7 million financial scandal are raising even more questions about how one! co bu e of the largest financial losses in the city’s history was allowed to happen. A detailed timeline released Wednesday, November 11, reveals how someone impersonating a representative of B.L. Harbert International, the Birmingham-based construction company building Regions Arena, spent months communicating with city employees before successfully diverting a $14.7 million payment into a fraudulent bank account. Perhaps one of the most troubling revelations is that the money was ultimately transferred to a bank account at a financial institution that B.L. Harbert International does not use. The contractor never received the money, even though the city believed it had completed its payment obligations. The newly released timeline provides a closer look at how the scheme developed, how banking information was repeatedly changed, and how multiple opportunities to identify the fraud apparently went unnoticed. A Scam That Began Months Before The Money Disappeared According to the city’s timeline, the scheme began on May 22, when an individual contacted the Finance Department while pretending to represent B.L. Harbert International. The individual presented what appeared to be a routine vendor-information update, claiming the company needed to change its banking information because of an internal staffing change. On May 26, the impersonator submitted completed forms and supporting documents containing fraudulent banking information. By May 27, city employees had updated the company’s vendor records. However, the request was not independently verified through an established contact with the legitimate construction company. The communications continued. Between June 12 and June 22, the individual submitted another set of banking instructions, claiming additional changes were necessary because of an internal audit. City employees again updated the vendor information. By this point, the fraudulent operation had been developing for nearly a month, with repeated requests for changes to financial information. Genuine City Payment Records Were Shared With The Impostor One of the most concerning revelations involves the exchange of legitimate financial documents. During July, the individual requested information about previous payments and asked whether future payments would be deposited using the newly submitted banking instructions. On July 13, another vendor-record update was processed. Then, on July 23, city employees provided records showing previous transactions involving B.L. Harbert International. Those records reportedly helped the impersonator establish credibility and make the fraudulent communications appear legitimate. The situation became even more serious as the requested banking changes moved beyond routine vendor records and reached employees responsible for the city’s actual payment instructions. September 24: The Critical Banking Change Was Confirmed In late July, city employees began contacting the city’s banking institution about changing the payment instructions associated with B.L. Harbert International. Additional requests followed over the next several weeks. The bank did not immediately implement the changes, and at least one subsequent arena construction payment still went to the legitimate contractor’s existing account. However, the city continued pursuing the requested changes. On September 24, the bank confirmed the new payment instructions. That confirmation ultimately set the stage for the $14.7 million transfer. October 2–5: $14.7 Million Sent To A Fraudulent Account On October 2, city employees submitted payment instructions for a $14.7 million construction payment. The invoice was legitimate, and B.L. Harbert International was the actual contractor owed the money. But the banking information directing where the funds would go had been manipulated. By October 5, the payment had been processed and the money had gone to the fraudulent account. The receiving financial institution was not a bank used by B.L. Harbert International, a significant warning sign that raises questions about why the payment instructions were not more thoroughly verified before millions of taxpayer dollars were transferred. October 7–16: Missing Payment Raises Questions On October 7, B.L. Harbert International contacted the city because the company had not received its expected payment. The following day, the city received information from its bank indicating that the contractor should have received the funds on October 5. The bank also provided a transaction-tracking number. However, according to the timeline, employees did not escalate that information to supervisors for further investigation. On October 13, the city’s project manager followed up on the missing payment, and tracking information was forwarded to the contractor. It was not until October 16 that Mayor Spiro Cheriogotis and Finance Director Logan Gewin learned the money had been diverted through a fraudulent transaction. On that same day, B.L. Harbert confirmed that it did not have an account at the financial institution where the $14.7 million had been deposited. The discovery exposed the full extent of the financial deception. Questions About Accountability And Financial Oversight The revelations are particularly troubling because the city had already experienced another attempted financial scam in August involving nearly $1 million. That earlier attempt was identified within approximately two days, allowing the city to recover the money. This time, however, the fraudulent operation continued for months, and the city did not identify the missing $14.7 million until two weeks after the payment was initiated. Mayor Cheriogotis previously announced that one city employee had been terminated and two others had been placed on paid administrative leave following the discovery. The FBI and U.S. Secret Service are investigating the incident. The administration has also announced changes to financial safeguards and procedures for processing large payments. Despite those developments, important questions remain about who approved the banking changes, why the contractor’s identity was not independently verified, why the payment discrepancy was not immediately escalated, and what additional safeguards could have prevented the loss. Mobile Taxpayers Deserve Answers The $14.7 million loss is more than a financial headline. It represents public money that was supposed to support a major construction project and was instead diverted through an elaborate impersonation scheme. Although city officials have maintained that the incident will not threaten the city’s overall financial stability or delay the completion of Regions Arena, taxpayers have every reason to demand a thorough explanation. The most disturbing part of this timeline is that the scam did not happen overnight. It reportedly involved months of communication, repeated changes to banking information, the exchange of legitimate financial records, and multiple opportunities to recognize that something was wrong. A single fraudulent payment instruction should never have been enough to redirect $14.7 million in public funds without rigorous independent verification. The people of Mobile deserve transparency, accountability, and answers. Who approved the changes? Who authorized the payment? Why were the warning signs missed? And, most importantly, what is being done to recover the money? Those questions should remain at the center of the investigation until the public receives a complete accounting of what happened. The FBI and U.S. Secret Service investigation remains ongoing. Share this:Tweet Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor More Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Like this:Like Loading… Related Post navigation Mississippi Voter Roll Controversy Deepens: More Than 230,000 Voters Marked Inactive As Secretary Of State Faces Calls For Accountability